why him?meet the uncle adults
For the comedy theme, I have long held a point of view, that is a good comedy is always rare than the tragedy to see. Although the comedy of the kernel is always a tragedy, but the comedy always have a corresponding cultural background in order to give full play to its appeal. While the tragedy is not, as long as the good damage to see on the line. Comedy form can be divided into two directions, one based on language, one based on limb movements. But the "hangover" and after the "hangover" era of R-class comedy opened a very bad head: blindly violent piled embarrassing elements, a large number of scattered three vulgar content of the main anti-off, blurred the need for a reasonable story, which also destroyed The completeness of comedy.
Take the family theme as an example: Every era has its "see family" movie, because it can be a family as a unit, highlighting the contradictions and differences between generations, providing room for social reflection. In the late 1960s, "Guess who to eat dinner" is one of the leaders, not only with Spencer Cassie, Catherine Hepburn and Sidney Bodier such a generation of classic, at the same time by the story of interracial marriage , Deeply reflect on the root of the American society in the depths of racial discrimination that enduring classic issues.
After the social contradictions have eased, the new millennium "see relatives" on behalf of Ben Stiller and his famous series "meet the father-in-law adults" body. The heroes are no longer bear a heavy social burden, but from the individual identity / lifestyle, launched both life and dramatic tit for tat. At this point the resonant demand for the audience's cultural background, it turned to the identity of the background of the resonance needs. And the daughter-in-law / husband-in-law relationship can be described as universal, the hero of the problems are also starting from the parents in the short starting from the marriage to the child to school middle school crisis - to be out of date, with a high degree of life sense.
But after 16 years "why is he?" ", The former in the performance, humor and taste of all the advantages have disappeared.
2016 is the most decline of comedy movies year, "criminal master" "boss" "nine life" "office Christmas party" old-fashioned, "supermodel 2" simply mentally retarded, "Neighborhood Wars 2" "Greensby" , Only do not engage in the base of the "tear detective", black brothers, "Keanu cat" be a small bright spot, can not lift the wind and waves.
What about comedy movies? From the performance of these works, Will Farrell as the representative of the veteran absent, the Mesozoic project too much lack of joy, I saw the trees do not see the forest, and one of the few new generation and play but can succeed. But from the work itself, impetuous creative ideas and quick money to make simple thinking is more terrible things.
If "why is he?" "Can not make you directly think of" meet the father-in-law adults, "then, then there is only one reason: you are not familiar with comedy movies. In this three vulgar family comedy, the two generations of comics on the same subject matter, and even the same template to understand and reproduce, have shown most vividly. And in this "meet the father-in-law adults," the modern imitation of the front of the scenes, we see is the second line of the old man (Ben Stiller and the old partner Sean Levy, Stewart Kangfield common Production, the original screenwriter John Hanberge even took the guide tube), and can not wait to take the banner of the new people (Apa / Seth Luo root to help Jonah Hill into the screenwriter, James Franco Bear the protagonist). In this new version, the two sides of the struggle into a conservative father and daughter strange strange billionaire boyfriend, but his father became a normal one. Even if the choice of the Christmas schedule, this seemingly family fun comedy is also very vulgar And humor part of the irresponsible compared to the film in the corners to rely on a little trick: succession Robert De Niro's old white Brian Colanston is the whole film core and the biggest bright spot, but in the bad script , Has become not in the first act to illustrate, but by default in the middle-aged crisis of the old-fashioned; feces fart James Franco is still in recent years, the usual feces fart, simply make you can not tell if he is doing drama or be yourself. In addition to this, the solo Jagan - Michael Kay in this movie is still to play the role of heavy (after all, talent), Cedric Kyle and Megan Morley feel a little high, but Female Zoe Daqi dragged his hind legs, neither fit nor call, both with the male and family and between, did not successfully establish emotional contact, not as good as the sound of Carrey Kuko there is a sense of existence. But compared with the performance of the gap, "why is he? "And" meet the father-in-law adults, "reflected between the concept of difference is more interesting. After 16 years, the hero from 囧 son into 囧 father, it seems precisely and the audience is proportional to the age of growth. And "meet the father-in-law adults" stressed the concept of family and family members compared to "why is he? "More important is the friends and relatives change dog friends, not relatives to win their loved ones - from emphasizing the family to emphasize the individual, this is a very worthwhile consideration of the times change factors. Another important change is the social identity of Weng. "Meet the father-in-law adults", the son-in-law is a conscientious nurse, father-in-law is a high-tech play live retirement CIA; "Why is he? "In the father-in-law is a conscientious middle-class small boss, son-in-law is a high-tech play in the Silicon Valley fashion business owners. We can clearly see that in two times, the film from the emphasis on family / social value to emphasize the personal value, from the son-in-law to please the elders, forced to accept the elders to accept the next three abuse of the so-called "trendy." And which show the money worship and money supremacy, was abruptly misinterpreted for the different life philosophy - honestly feed their families, but minutes and minutes are more gold and rampant future son-in-law acquisition, and finally inexplicably suddenly shake hands and welcome , Is simply to please the rebellious period of the young audience of the standard Jack Su.
You can come to the hottest horse a dragon to speak for the Silicon Valley, but there is no way to eliminate the basic values of deformity and twisting Pakistan.
Remove the "meet the father-in-law adults" left the foundation, "why is he? "Are brought in the same brains, floating skin scrawled plot and story, and the same as the brains, occasional hi rather than nausea humor fragments. Vulgar and vulgar can indeed bring a certain sense of humor, but no matter how to wash white, and will never be the mainstream values.
That is, using a genius, handsome, more gold technology industry to sell small boss is not OK.
In Hollywood before making more of the vulgar comedy, I would like to first slow down, think about what is comedy as well.
Take the family theme as an example: Every era has its "see family" movie, because it can be a family as a unit, highlighting the contradictions and differences between generations, providing room for social reflection. In the late 1960s, "Guess who to eat dinner" is one of the leaders, not only with Spencer Cassie, Catherine Hepburn and Sidney Bodier such a generation of classic, at the same time by the story of interracial marriage , Deeply reflect on the root of the American society in the depths of racial discrimination that enduring classic issues.
After the social contradictions have eased, the new millennium "see relatives" on behalf of Ben Stiller and his famous series "meet the father-in-law adults" body. The heroes are no longer bear a heavy social burden, but from the individual identity / lifestyle, launched both life and dramatic tit for tat. At this point the resonant demand for the audience's cultural background, it turned to the identity of the background of the resonance needs. And the daughter-in-law / husband-in-law relationship can be described as universal, the hero of the problems are also starting from the parents in the short starting from the marriage to the child to school middle school crisis - to be out of date, with a high degree of life sense.
But after 16 years "why is he?" ", The former in the performance, humor and taste of all the advantages have disappeared.
What about comedy movies? From the performance of these works, Will Farrell as the representative of the veteran absent, the Mesozoic project too much lack of joy, I saw the trees do not see the forest, and one of the few new generation and play but can succeed. But from the work itself, impetuous creative ideas and quick money to make simple thinking is more terrible things.
If "why is he?" "Can not make you directly think of" meet the father-in-law adults, "then, then there is only one reason: you are not familiar with comedy movies. In this three vulgar family comedy, the two generations of comics on the same subject matter, and even the same template to understand and reproduce, have shown most vividly. And in this "meet the father-in-law adults," the modern imitation of the front of the scenes, we see is the second line of the old man (Ben Stiller and the old partner Sean Levy, Stewart Kangfield common Production, the original screenwriter John Hanberge even took the guide tube), and can not wait to take the banner of the new people (Apa / Seth Luo root to help Jonah Hill into the screenwriter, James Franco Bear the protagonist). In this new version, the two sides of the struggle into a conservative father and daughter strange strange billionaire boyfriend, but his father became a normal one. Even if the choice of the Christmas schedule, this seemingly family fun comedy is also very vulgar And humor part of the irresponsible compared to the film in the corners to rely on a little trick: succession Robert De Niro's old white Brian Colanston is the whole film core and the biggest bright spot, but in the bad script , Has become not in the first act to illustrate, but by default in the middle-aged crisis of the old-fashioned; feces fart James Franco is still in recent years, the usual feces fart, simply make you can not tell if he is doing drama or be yourself. In addition to this, the solo Jagan - Michael Kay in this movie is still to play the role of heavy (after all, talent), Cedric Kyle and Megan Morley feel a little high, but Female Zoe Daqi dragged his hind legs, neither fit nor call, both with the male and family and between, did not successfully establish emotional contact, not as good as the sound of Carrey Kuko there is a sense of existence. But compared with the performance of the gap, "why is he? "And" meet the father-in-law adults, "reflected between the concept of difference is more interesting. After 16 years, the hero from 囧 son into 囧 father, it seems precisely and the audience is proportional to the age of growth. And "meet the father-in-law adults" stressed the concept of family and family members compared to "why is he? "More important is the friends and relatives change dog friends, not relatives to win their loved ones - from emphasizing the family to emphasize the individual, this is a very worthwhile consideration of the times change factors. Another important change is the social identity of Weng. "Meet the father-in-law adults", the son-in-law is a conscientious nurse, father-in-law is a high-tech play live retirement CIA; "Why is he? "In the father-in-law is a conscientious middle-class small boss, son-in-law is a high-tech play in the Silicon Valley fashion business owners. We can clearly see that in two times, the film from the emphasis on family / social value to emphasize the personal value, from the son-in-law to please the elders, forced to accept the elders to accept the next three abuse of the so-called "trendy." And which show the money worship and money supremacy, was abruptly misinterpreted for the different life philosophy - honestly feed their families, but minutes and minutes are more gold and rampant future son-in-law acquisition, and finally inexplicably suddenly shake hands and welcome , Is simply to please the rebellious period of the young audience of the standard Jack Su.
Remove the "meet the father-in-law adults" left the foundation, "why is he? "Are brought in the same brains, floating skin scrawled plot and story, and the same as the brains, occasional hi rather than nausea humor fragments. Vulgar and vulgar can indeed bring a certain sense of humor, but no matter how to wash white, and will never be the mainstream values.
That is, using a genius, handsome, more gold technology industry to sell small boss is not OK.
In Hollywood before making more of the vulgar comedy, I would like to first slow down, think about what is comedy as well.
评论
发表评论