why not both
why not both? Fish and bear's paw why can not have both?
I know this is a metaphor, but why not say that cats and dogs can not have both? They can not have both the reason is a land in the land, or both are very precious? What fish is the fish?
According to what I know, bears are carnivores, and many are hunting fish for food. Ancient technology is not developed, they think that the bear is to eat fish, kill the bear, hit the bear Zhang can not use the bear to kill the fish, and kill the fish can not be in the place where the fish hit the bear. So contradictory.
This sentence comes from "Mencius" original fish, I want also; bear's paw, also I also want, the two are not available, the fish and take the bear's paw also. So this sentence is not to say that there are two kinds of conflict, can not get, but that when you two in some cases can only choose one, you will choose which, obviously bear paw more precious, so to choose bear's paw. In order to set off the following, when you want to choose the choice of moral, rather than life. Now people use this sentence seems strange why not have both do not know the original context only.
I know this is a metaphor, but why not say that cats and dogs can not have both? They can not have both the reason is a land in the land, or both are very precious? What fish is the fish?
According to what I know, bears are carnivores, and many are hunting fish for food. Ancient technology is not developed, they think that the bear is to eat fish, kill the bear, hit the bear Zhang can not use the bear to kill the fish, and kill the fish can not be in the place where the fish hit the bear. So contradictory.
This sentence comes from "Mencius" original fish, I want also; bear's paw, also I also want, the two are not available, the fish and take the bear's paw also. So this sentence is not to say that there are two kinds of conflict, can not get, but that when you two in some cases can only choose one, you will choose which, obviously bear paw more precious, so to choose bear's paw. In order to set off the following, when you want to choose the choice of moral, rather than life. Now people use this sentence seems strange why not have both do not know the original context only.
评论
发表评论